Leadership Is Not for Cowards

3. Februar 2020
Kategorien
Newsletter abonnieren

Leadership Is Not for Cowards

Fewer “bad leader” types have the capacity to paralyze a team more than a coward – the leader who praises poor performance, avoids difficult issues, and buys loyalty by saying yes to anyone and any idea.

The dictionary defines the word coward, when used as a noun, as “a person who lacks courage in facing danger, difficulty, opposition, pain, etc.; a timid or easily intimidated person.

Coward leaders are in every organization, at every level of an organization, from the first line supervisor to the company CEO; government bureaucrats to elected officials … they’re out there … they’re everywhere … like an insidious disease; they corrupt employee morale, destroy trust in teams and organizations, and even threaten the very existence of their teams and organizations.

Working for one is probably one of the most discouraging experiences one can have.

Below are thirteen differences between strong leaders and cowardly ones. Recognize any of these characteristics in your own manager — or yourself?

1) Strong leaders reward achievement rather than effort

Weak leaders, on the other hand, reward effort rather than achievement. It’s a mistake to be too “soft” about expectations, to say, “Just do your best.” People will not achieve just because you encourage and motivate them. Somebody must drive performance. Somebody must plant the flag on the hill and refuse to accept anything but success. That somebody is you.

Courageous leaders layout expected results in the most effective and humane way possible and are clear about the consequences of not meeting them. Managers may worry about upsetting their employees, so they don’t set high expectations.

I believe in a respectful workplace where people enjoy their jobs and look forward to coming to work, but I am also in full support of less whining and more doing, less passing the buck and more personal responsibility, less explaining why you didn’t and more showing how you did.

2) Strong leaders collaborate with their team members to create a vision

Cowardly leaders don’t dare to establish a vision — they take their orders from the higher-ups. It takes courage to have vision, because you have to believe you can realize the vision, no matter what obstacles may appear in your way.

Cowardly leaders are more comfortable measuring people against handed-down yardsticks, than inspiring people to achieve great things.

3) Strong leaders hire strong and confident people

They don’t hire people based on endless lists of essential requirements but rather based on the pluck and brains of the candidates they meet. Cowardly leaders stick like glue to the bulleted list of essential requirements when they hire people. All they need to know is «Is this person a ’safe‘ hire that I won’t be criticized for hiring?» and «Is this person someone who will listen to me?»

Cowardly leaders don’t dare hire someone with their own ideas, because that person might outshine the manager one day!

4) Strong leaders tell the truth about sticky topics

If they run into a conflict with an employee, they’ll address it head-on and compassionately. They’ll say, «Look, we see things differently regarding the project scope and priorities. Let’s talk about it.»

Cowardly managers don’t dig into conflict in order to sort it out. They say, «I’m the manager, so we’re going to do it my way.», or they don’t say anything at all. That way they don’t have to look any more closely at their words and actions than they’re comfortable with.

5) Strong leaders speak up when they feel strongly about something 

If a new policy gets enacted at Corporate and they’re told they must enforce the new policy, strong leaders will go to their boss and say «Red alert! This policy makes no sense. It will anger our employees and suck away our team’s precious mojo.» When six or eight supervisors all say the same thing with equal vehemence, the manager will tell the folks at Corporate that the new policy is %&ç@ and the Corporate people will revisit it.

A cowardly supervisor may hate the new policy as much as a strong supervisor does, but they won’t speak up. They’ll enforce the policy and tell their employees, «There’s nothing I can do about it.»

6) Strong leaders take responsibility instead of placing blame

This is an energy-draining, counterproductive way of dealing with difficult circumstances. Blaming someone else puts you in the position of a victim who is not in control. Therefore, you won’t take action to change your circumstances because it’s someone else’s problem. (How convenient, huh?). Victim thinking affects not just individuals but entire organizations.

Acknowledging that you are ultimately responsible for the results of your life, thoughts, and actions creates a level of freedom not experienced by those who choose to blame others. It empowers you to act. Courageous leaders are driven by, even obsessed with, the imperative to eliminate excuse-making and blame from themselves and their organizations.

7) Strong leaders give people latitude

They are available to answer questions, but their general posture is «It’s your job — do it your way.» Weak leaders don’t trust themselves enough to hire people they can trust. They spell out every detail — and woe to the employee who does their job even slightly different from the standard process. They are like a helicopter.

Helicopter leaders are afraid to let go because they believe the work won’t get done if they don’t oversee every detail. Either this fear is unfounded or it’s a sign that employees really aren’t capable of doing their jobs. The solution is simple: do your job and let them do theirs, or get rid of incompetent employees and replace them with people who can get the job done.

8) Strong leaders know they don’t know everything

They lead through trust, rather than fear. If a teammate tells the supervisor, «I think you’re using the A valve, but it’s the B valve we need,» the supervisor will say, «Thanks for noticing that!» They don’t freak out when somebody corrects them, because they know that it takes everybody’s brain cells to make a department go.

Cowardly managers can’t stand being corrected. They don’t want to learn from their teammates. They aren’t open to learning in general!

9) Strong leaders take the easy way out only if it is the right way

Weak leaders frequently take the easy way out. They avoid taking bold, decisive action because it makes them uncomfortable. Then, they rationalize why they didn’t do what they really needed to do. It’s easier to avoid taking action (at least in the short term), but it’s also a sure path to mediocrity and stagnation.

10) Strong leaders don’t pretend to don’t know what they know

Weak leaders pretend they don’t know what they actually know. They pretend they don’t know about opportunities in order to avoid risk. They pretend they don’t know that a high performer is behaving badly and making other employees unhappy. They pretend that your biggest client isn’t crushing employee morale. Maybe, they even pretend they don’t know it’s time for them to move on.

All of this pretending allows them to avoid pain and feel good in the short term, but it exacts a heavy price over time. There is always a price to be paid for necessary actions not taken. The job of a leader is to look reality in the face and accept it so that you can make the tough decisions that need to be made.

11) Strong leaders don’t ignore what’s causing “weight and drag” in their organization

Maybe it’s a policy, a person, or a mindset that’s holding them or their team back from optimal performance. They ask themself: What am I doing, or not doing, that is adding weight and drag? Am I refusing to make a decision, waiting to hire an assistant, delaying a hiring or firing issue?

At the core of your job as a leader is your role as an obstacle remover. Be courageous: remove the obstacles you can and work around the ones that remain so that you can stay productive, directed, and focused.

12) Strong leaders don’t hide behind the “I’m not quite ready” excuse

Leaders and organizations spend too much time getting ready to be ready to get ready to almost get ready to be ready to get ready. Then they form a committee or a task force (which is just a committee on steroids) to evaluate more and look into the situation more so that they can really be ready. Getting overly ready is a result of fear. You don’t want to fail so instead you put off the moment of truth by perpetually getting ready.

Should you prepare? Of course! Do your research? Yes. But stop hiding behind the “we aren’t quite ready” curtain. Say, “Enough is enough,” and just do it—even if conditions aren’t perfect.

13) Strong leaders don’t ignore information

Weak leaders see only the information that agrees with their beliefs. We all have a natural tendency to ignore information that contradicts our beliefs about the world, especially our negative beliefs. If we believe someone doesn’t like us, we will see only those behaviors that support that impression. If we think we are bad at something, we will see only more evidence of that conclusion. This tendency is so strong that it blinds us to contrary evidence. As long as we don’t see other possibilities we don’t have to take action.

Closing thoughts

The business world is full of coward leaders; as is the government. Of all the factors that are used to describe a coward leader the one element of the coward leader that usually isn’t mentioned is the basic character flaw of not having the guts to look you in the eye and being honest with you. They will try to find any way they can to avoid dealing with tough issues. Coward leaders are scared people, refusing to confront at all costs… Don’t be one of them.

 
In a nutshell: Leadership is not for cowards.
Tags

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren

The Five Elements of a Strong Governance Structure for Critical Projects

16. Januar 2025

Every executive has nightmares about that project—the one that spirals into an unmitigated disaster.  In general there are four ways a project can end up in a boardroom-shaking failure that can destroy value, reputations, and trust in one fell swoop. 1. The Titanic Failure: The project chugs along, oblivious to the iceberg ahead, burning millions

Weiterlesen

Why Every Critical Project Needs Independent Reviews

14. Januar 2025

«Trust, but verify.» That timeless adage applies as much to critical projects as it does to diplomacy. Without an independent review, even the best-run projects can veer off course, leaving organizations blindsided by delays, cost overruns, or outright failures. Here’s the uncomfortable truth: internal stakeholders are often too close to the project to see the

Weiterlesen

Why Every Critical Project Needs an Executive Sponsor

13. Januar 2025

Launching a critical project without an executive sponsor is like sending a ship to sea without a captain—good luck steering through the storm. Projects don’t fail because of bad intentions. They fail because of a lack of alignment, authority, and support.  That’s where the executive sponsor steps in—not just as a figurehead but as the

Weiterlesen

Why Every Critical Project Needs a Dedicated Project Manager

12. Januar 2025

Far too often, organizations assign critical projects to people who already have full-time roles or, worse, delegate management to a loosely organized team with no single point of accountability. The results? Missed deadlines, blown budgets, and a whole lot of finger-pointing. Here’s the hard truth: if the project is important, it deserves a dedicated project

Weiterlesen

Case Study 21: The Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) $250 Million CHESS Blunder

6. Januar 2025

The Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) embarked on an ambitious journey to replace its 25-year-old Clearing House Electronic Subregister System (CHESS) with a state-of-the-art, blockchain-based platform.  Initially envisioned as a groundbreaking project to enhance efficiency, security, and scalability, the CHESS replacement project quickly turned into a cautionary tale.  The initiative faced repeated delays and escalating costs

Weiterlesen

Project Recovery

2. Januar 2025

  Projects fail for a variety of reasons. Especially technology projects have a low success rate. Typically more than half of them are considered a failure. If your current in-house or outsourced software or web development project is off track, chances are I can bring the necessary input and expertise to get the job done. Troubled projects

Weiterlesen

When $100 Million Technology Projects Fail, It’s the Board’s Fault—Every Single Time

2. Januar 2025

In Switzerland, rumors suggest that both Bank Julius Bär and Raiffeisen Schweiz are grappling with failed technology projects, each costing over $100 million so far. Bank Julius Bär is reportedly trying to replace its existing core banking system for the Swiss booking center with Temenos, while Raiffeisen Schweiz is attempting to build a modern e-banking

Weiterlesen

10 Essential Questions Every Board Should Ask About Technology

16. Dezember 2024

Board members play an important role in steering organizations through the complexities of technology initiatives.  To fulfil this role effectively, it’s essential to ask the right questions that probe the strategic, operational, and risk aspects of technology projects.  Here are ten critical questions every board should consider: 1) How does this technology initiative align with

Weiterlesen

Independent Board Advisory

16. Dezember 2024

Effective boards provide clarity, governance, and oversight to steer organizations toward success. However, large technology initiatives, digital transformations, and innovation efforts often challenge even the most seasoned boards.  My Board Advisory service empowers boards and board members to navigate the complexities of modern technology decisions with confidence and precision. As a trusted advisor and experienced

Weiterlesen

Case Study 20: The $4 Billion AI Failure of IBM Watson for Oncology

7. Dezember 2024

In 2011, IBM’s Watson took the world by storm when it won the television game show Jeopardy!, showcasing the power of artificial intelligence (AI). Emboldened by this success, IBM sought to extend Watson’s capabilities beyond trivia to address real-world challenges.    Healthcare, with its complex data and critical decision-making needs, became a primary focus. Among

Weiterlesen
Next