People, Process, Technology (In Exactly That Order!)

11. Mai 2020
Kategorien
Newsletter abonnieren

People, Process, Technology (In Exactly That Order!)

As an IT or information security professional, you cannot read a blog, book or paper without crossing paths with these three words; people, process, technology. 

 
Popularized in the infosec world at the end of last century by Bruce Schneier, these three nouns have been at the heart of the ITIL set of practices since their birth in the 1980s, and has its origins linked to Harold Leavitt’s Diamond Model theorized in 1965 (with the organization’s tasks representing the fourth component). 
 
It has also been referred to as the “golden triangle”, the 3 keys to successful project implementations and organisational change, and a back-to-basics approach to solving complex business problems.
 
The reason for this triangular focus comes down to one very important fact: 
 
To get sh!t done effectively in any organization requires an approach that optimises the relationships between people, process & technology.
 
By focusing on only one or two areas an imbalance is created. The result will be that you waste lots of money and time, and your best people will look for a job elsewhere. 
 
Take a new technology for example, many organizations believe that by implementing a new shiny tool, all of their problems will go away. 
 
But what they’re not seeing is that technology is only as good as the processes that are implemented around it, and processes are only as good as the people who execute them. 
 
 
People, Process, Technology (In Exactly That Order!)
But how do you get the balance right?
 
Always start with your people
 
> Identify your key players & understand what each of them want, and what they bring to the table.
 
> Confirm that you have senior management buy-in (right from the start), because without it you will fail.
 
> Ensure that your team consists of the right people with the right skills, experience and attitude to help you solve your problem. Practical experience is priceless, too many organizations have only theorists and consultants.
 
Once your people are committed, consider the process
 
> A process is defined as a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end. So with that in mind, ask the question: What processes do we need in order to solve this business problem?
 
> A good place to start is by identifying the big, key steps. Once those are in place you can then focus on a more detailed level by looking at process variations, exceptions, interdependencies and supporting processes.
 
> Now review these processes with your stakeholders. Ensure that they’re aware of what’s expected from them and let them guide you with regards to possible gaps and issues.
 
And as last you select the technology
 
> With your people and processes in place, you can now look at technologies which will support them.
 
> It’s never a good idea to force a technology and then attempt to retrofit the people and processes around it. At the same time you should understand and accept that SaaS means “Software as a Service” and is not the same as custom software development.
 
> Technology should always be the final consideration once the problem is clearly understood and the solution requirements have been clearly defined.
 
This is all nothing new, but it seems to be forgotten time and again.
 
In a nutshell: To get sh!t done effectively in any organization requires optimising the relationships between people, process & technology. In exactly that order!
Tags

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #4 – Accountability vs. Alignment

1. April 2026

In large transformation programs, accountability is rarely missing. It is distributed. It sits with executive sponsors, steering committees, transformation offices, service line leaders, and partner groups, each with a defined role and a legitimate claim to involvement. On paper, this creates alignment. In practice, it often removes ownership, because when accountability is spread across too

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #3 – Long-Term Investment vs. Short-Term Management

27. März 2026

One of the most underestimated constraints in professional services transformation is not technology, capability, or even funding. It is time. Real transformation takes longer than most firms are structurally able to tolerate. Core systems such as ERP platforms, data architectures, AI capabilities, or global workflow solutions are not incremental improvements. They are foundational changes. They

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #2 – Internal vs. Client Execution

26. März 2026

One of the most persistent, and least openly discussed, tensions in professional services firms lies in how they execute their own transformations. It is a tension that does not reveal itself in strategy decks or partner presentations, but in the day-to-day reality of large internal programs that quietly struggle to deliver. At first glance, the

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #1 – Technology Alliances vs. Internal Fit

20. März 2026

This article is part of a series exploring the tensions at the core of the Professional Services Transformation Paradox. The paradox itself is straightforward, yet deeply consequential. Firms that excel at transforming their clients often struggle to transform themselves. Not because they lack capability, but because their own structures, incentives, and operating models create resistance

Weiterlesen

The Five Elements of a Strong Governance Structure for Critical Projects

16. Januar 2025

Every executive has nightmares about that project—the one that spirals into an unmitigated disaster.  In general there are four ways a project can end up in a boardroom-shaking failure that can destroy value, reputations, and trust in one fell swoop. 1. The Titanic Failure: The project chugs along, oblivious to the iceberg ahead, burning millions

Weiterlesen

Why Every Critical Project Needs Board Supervision

15. Januar 2025

Projects are like icebergs—what you see above the surface is just the tip. Below lies the complexity, risk, and opportunity that can sink your ship if ignored. Too often, boards treat projects like black boxes, leaving management to deliver results without sufficient oversight. This hands-off approach might work for routine initiatives, but when it comes

Weiterlesen

Why Every Critical Project Needs Independent Reviews

14. Januar 2025

«Trust, but verify.» That timeless adage applies as much to critical projects as it does to diplomacy. Without an independent review, even the best-run projects can veer off course, leaving organizations blindsided by delays, cost overruns, or outright failures. Here’s the uncomfortable truth: internal stakeholders are often too close to the project to see the

Weiterlesen

Why Every Critical Project Needs an Executive Sponsor

13. Januar 2025

Launching a critical project without an executive sponsor is like sending a ship to sea without a captain—good luck steering through the storm. Projects don’t fail because of bad intentions. They fail because of a lack of alignment, authority, and support.  That’s where the executive sponsor steps in—not just as a figurehead but as the

Weiterlesen

Why Every Critical Project Needs a Dedicated Project Manager

12. Januar 2025

Far too often, organizations assign critical projects to people who already have full-time roles or, worse, delegate management to a loosely organized team with no single point of accountability. The results? Missed deadlines, blown budgets, and a whole lot of finger-pointing. Here’s the hard truth: if the project is important, it deserves a dedicated project

Weiterlesen

When $100 Million Technology Projects Fail, It’s the Board’s Fault—Every Single Time

2. Januar 2025

In Switzerland, rumors suggest that both Bank Julius Bär and Raiffeisen Schweiz are grappling with failed technology projects, each costing over $100 million so far. Bank Julius Bär is reportedly trying to replace its existing core banking system for the Swiss booking center with Temenos, while Raiffeisen Schweiz is attempting to build a modern e-banking

Weiterlesen
Next