The Art of Technology Project Portfolio Management

11. April 2020
Kategorien
Newsletter abonnieren

The Art of Technology Project Portfolio Management

A hands-on guide for all C-level executives, project portfolio owners, and project portfolio managers.

It will show you:

> Why your project should be short and fat
> Why killing projects is so hard (and how to do it anyway)
> Why you should stop wasting money on FOMO innovation projects
> Why you should start slow in order to run fast later
> Why you should stop funding on a project level

And much more…

If you are responsible for managing portfolios of technology programs and projects, your success in maximizing business outcomes with finite resources is vital to your company’s future in a fast-changing and digital world.

You can buy the eBook in my store by clicking on the image below.

Project portfolio management is the art and science of making decisions about investment mix, operational constraints, resource allocation, project priority, and schedule. It is about understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the portfolio, predicting opportunities and threats, matching investments to objectives, and optimizing trade-offs encountered in the attempt to maximize return (i.e., outcomes over investments) at a given appetite for risk (i.e., uncertainty about return).

As an independent project recovery consultant with over 15 years of experience with managing large technology projects, I’ve learned a lot about what it takes to run such projects successfully. I have had the privilege to work with great companies and people on challenging technology projects and innovation portfolios. This has given me some unique experiences and insights on how such projects, and the portfolios they are part of, can be successful.

During these years I have learned that most large companies have a project portfolio management process in place, and they mostly follow the traditional project portfolio management process as put on paper by the Project Management Institute (PMI). This process is comprehensible and stable by nature.

Even better, it has the appearance of a marvelous mechanical system that can be followed in a plannable, stable, and reproducible manner. In the end, the project with the greatest strategic contributions always wins the battle for the valuable resources.

Unfortunately, this process does not work well in the real world, despite its apparent elegance. Ultimately, it is characterized by uncertainty, difficulties, ever-changing market environments, and, of course, people—and these do not function like machines.

Although I am a voracious reader I had a very hard time finding material that helped me with addressing these real-life problems. There are many (many) books on project portfolio management. There are also organizations that offer certification in project portfolio management. But they are all theory, and much of it does not work in practice—especially not when technology projects are concerned.   

This led me to conclude that there is a shortage of candid and straightforward information for executives responsible for technology project portfolio management.

At the same time, I grew frustrated with the shortcomings of blogging, which I began to do in earnest in 2015 with my blog “Doing the right projects and doing projects right” I quickly learned that people rarely scroll past the homepage of a blog or search for previous articles. However, I wanted my blog to serve as a constant reference source for a wide range of topics on technology project and portfolio management.

The reality is that blogs aren’t for everyone. These two forces inspired me to publish this book.

In short, The Art of Technology Project Portfolio Management is a tweaked, updated, and supplemented compilation of the best essays I have written based on everything I’ve done and seen that pertains to technology project portfolio management.

“A truly good book teaches me better than to read it. I must soon lay it down, and commence living on its hint. What I began by reading, I must finish by acting.” ― Henry David Thoreau 

My hope is that The Art of Technology Project Portfolio Management makes you act—in other words, that it passes the Henry David Thoreau test for a “truly good book.”

Buy the eBook in my store by clicking on the image below.

Tags

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #11 – Risk Mitigation vs. Innovation

7. Mai 2026

Professional services firms are designed to minimize risk. Their business model depends on trust, reputation, and consistency. Clients rely on them for assurance, judgment, and reliability, which means failure is not just a delivery issue, but a firm-level risk. A single incident can have disproportionate consequences, whether through litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or reputational damage. That

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #10 – Client Intimacy vs. Platform Standardization

28. April 2026

Professional services firms win through relationships. The closer they are to the client, the more value they create. Understanding the client’s context, adapting to their needs, shaping solutions around specific situations rather than applying generic ones. That is where trust is built, where differentiation happens, and where premium pricing becomes possible. Standardization moves in the

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #8 – Short-Term Revenue vs. Long-Term Capability

23. April 2026

Professional services firms are built around revenue. Revenue is visible, measurable, and immediate. It drives partner compensation, signals performance, and anchors decision-making across the firm. Every client won, every project sold, every hour billed translates directly into current-year outcomes. Capability building works differently. It requires investment upfront, often without immediate return, and pays off over

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #7 – Partner Autonomy vs. Firm-Level Strategy

18. April 2026

One of the defining features of professional services firms is partner autonomy. Partners are expected to build and run their own business. They originate clients, grow revenue, manage teams, and are rewarded based on the performance of what they directly control. This creates strong ownership, high accountability, and a culture where individual success is tightly

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #6 – Service Lines vs. Firm

16. April 2026

One of the most persistent illusions in professional services is the idea of “one firm.” From the outside, large firms present themselves as unified organizations. One brand, one client proposition, one set of capabilities delivered across audit, tax, advisory, and deals. The expectation is clear: if the firm is integrated in the market, it should

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #5 – Global Standardization vs. Local Economics

12. April 2026

One of the least discussed challenges in large transformation programs is the illusion of standardization. From the outside, global professional services firms look highly uniform. One brand, one set of services, one methodology, delivered across countries in a way that suggests consistency and control. Audit, tax, consulting, deals all appear to operate within the same

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #4 – Accountability vs. Alignment

1. April 2026

In large transformation programs, accountability is rarely missing. It is distributed. It sits with executive sponsors, steering committees, transformation offices, service line leaders, and partner groups, each with a defined role and a legitimate claim to involvement. On paper, this creates alignment. In practice, it often removes ownership, because when accountability is spread across too

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #3 – Long-Term Investment vs. Short-Term Management

27. März 2026

One of the most underestimated constraints in professional services transformation is not technology, capability, or even funding. It is time. Real transformation takes longer than most firms are structurally able to tolerate. Core systems such as ERP platforms, data architectures, AI capabilities, or global workflow solutions are not incremental improvements. They are foundational changes. They

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #2 – Internal vs. Client Execution

26. März 2026

One of the most persistent, and least openly discussed, tensions in professional services firms lies in how they execute their own transformations. It is a tension that does not reveal itself in strategy decks or partner presentations, but in the day-to-day reality of large internal programs that quietly struggle to deliver. At first glance, the

Weiterlesen

The Professional Services Transformation Paradox #1 – Technology Alliances vs. Internal Fit

20. März 2026

This article is part of a series exploring the tensions at the core of the Professional Services Transformation Paradox. The paradox itself is straightforward, yet deeply consequential. Firms that excel at transforming their clients often struggle to transform themselves. Not because they lack capability, but because their own structures, incentives, and operating models create resistance

Weiterlesen
Next